IAS reviewed the controller data and operating patterns in detail, quantifying the impact of the oversized machine on energy consumption, service requirements, and carbon output. The findings were presented clearly, giving Kinetic a transparent picture of the current costs and a straightforward case for change.
The recommendation was a replacement compressor matched to the depot's actual air demand, one that would operate within its intended load range rather than running flat out to produce air the site didn't need. Rather than spending $8,000 or more keeping an inefficient machine alive, Kinetic invested $16,700 in a solution that addressed the root problem. The full process from initial assessment to installation took six weeks.